Policy Impact

Dr. Yves Saint James Aquino

Doctor and philosopher of medicine, ethicist, social scientist

Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

I worked with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare in developing resources to support the safe and responsible use of AI in healthcare. 


Legislation, Policy, Guidelines and Principles, and Evidence about Quality and Safety. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care engaged Macquarie University and the University of Wollongong to undertake a literature review and environmental scan to identify principles that enable the safe and responsible implementation of AI in healthcare. 

Photo by Arseny Togulev on Unsplash

Consumer and community representatives are increasingly involved in, and advising on, matters related to artificial intelligence (AI). This guide provides consumer and community representatives with an introduction to AI in healthcare. It covers what this technology is, how it is used, some key issues and considerations (including possible benefits and risks), and tips on how to advise and advocate effectively in this area. 

Along with Stacy Carter and Farah Magrabi, I submitted a response to this consultation based on our program of research that examines the ethical, social, quality and safety issues in healthcare applications of AI.

We concluded that AI implementation in healthcare requires an integrated approach to clarify how existing governance mechanisms and regulatory processes apply to healthcare applications of AI technologies. Legal and policy analyses and reform, supported by robust community and consumer engagement, are needed to address concerns about accountability and liability, consent, privacy and transparency. We are grateful for the opportunity to provide a submission to this consultation, and would be pleased to expand on any of the above if useful to the Department’s deliberations.


The submission draws the agency’s attention to three issues that need to be addressed in the guidelines

  • Regulatory challenge of clarifying the distinction between cosmetic and reconstructive surgery
  • Need for practitioners to have access to appropriate training in evaluation of body dysmorphia
  • Need for guidance on the use of AI-generated images for advertisement

Our response addressing considerations from the inquiry’s terms of reference is based on our findings across our studies on the ethical, legal and social implications of the use of machine learning in healthcare.

  • Recent trends and opportunities in the development and adoption of AI technologies in Australia and overseas, in particular regarding generative AI
  • Risks and harms arising from the adoption of AI technologies, including bias, discrimination and error
  • Emerging international approaches (vertical versus horizontal) to mitigating AI risks
  • Opportunities to foster a responsible AI industry in Australia

Safe and Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Health Care – Legislation and Regulation Review: Final Report

  • Carter, S. M., Carolan, L., Aquino, Y. S. J., Frazer, H., Rogers, W. A., Hall, J., Degeling, C., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Houssami, N. (2023). Australian women’s judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231191057.
  • Carter, S. M., Aquino, Y. S. J., Carolan, L., Frost, E., Degeling, C., Rogers, W. A., Scott, I. A., Bell, K. J., Fabrianesi, B., & Magrabi, F. (2024). How should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health care? Recommendations from a citizens’ jury. Medical Journal of Australia, 220(8), 409-416.

AI evidence pathway for operationalising trustworthy AI in health – Publications Office of the EU

  • Aquino, Y. S. J. (2023). Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data‑driven diagnostic tools. Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(7), 439-452.
  • Lekadir, K., Frangi, A. F., Porras, A. R., Glocker, B., Cintas, C., Langlotz, C. P., Weicken, E., Asselbergs, F. W., Prior, F., & Collins, G. S. (2025). FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. bmj, 388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081554

AI from the Global Majority

  • Frost, E. K., Bosward, R., Aquino, Y. S. J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Carter, S. M. (2024). Facilitating public involvement in research about healthcare AI: A scoping review of empirical methods. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 105417.
  • Carter, S. M., Aquino, Y. S. J., Carolan, L., Frost, E., Degeling, C., Rogers, W. A., Scott, I. A., Bell, K. J., Fabrianesi, B., & Magrabi, F. (2024). How should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health care? Recommendations from a citizens’ jury. Medical Journal of Australia, 220(8), 409-416.

Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare in Scotland

  • Aquino, Y. S. J., Carter, S. M., Houssami, N., Braunack-Mayer, A., Win, K. T., Degeling, C., Wang, L., & Rogers, W. A. (2025). Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives. Journal of Medical Ethics, 51, 420-428. https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/6/420

Quality, Safety, and Disparities of AI Chatbots in Managing Chronic Diseases: Experimental Evidence

  • Vo, V., Chen, G., Aquino, Y. S. J., Carter, S. M., Do, Q. N., & Woode, M. E. (2023). Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 338, 116357.